Web 2.0 in action
I suffer from arthritic pain in the left great toe. Last year I had a manipulation and injection to sort it out, but the pain has returned.
So yesterday I saw the surgeon and he offered me a choice of a repeat procedure or (what I thought was) a kylectomy. He took me through the various options but I didn’t feel confident enough to make a decision, so of course I Googled it.
It very quickly became obvious that I had misspelled the word. Changing to chilectomy, Google helpfully asked me: “Did you mean: Cheilectomy “and in just two clicks I knew everything I needed to.
So What? Well until yesterday I had never heard of a cheilectomy. And now I am an expert and can make an informed choice which suits me, my plans and my pain threshold.
So what if I was selling cheilectomies? (Which I suppose in a way my surgeon is).
I believe that to sell effectively in the Web 2.0 world, you need to know how to be found on the web and secondly you need to have the skills (and the infrastructure) to convert enquiries in a single step. As soon as the customer goes away he is lost and it is very unlikely that you will be able to recover him or her.
Compare and contrast this with the conventional selling model in which you would first have to find someone with a problem to solve, get on their radar, establish the details of their situation, propose a solution and then close (handling objections along the way). This conventional model with 5 – 10 steps looks very different to the Web 2.0 model which is much simpler but still needs considerable skill.
There are almost 2,000,000 hits on the subject of cheilectomy (depending on how you spell it) but only about 20 blog entries and it is interesting that Jeffrey Oster, has cornered the market in foot pain advice in that sector. If I was in Ohio, he would certainly be my podiatrist of choice.
Message for today: start thinking about how Web 2.0 will affect (is affecting) your sales effort
Perry Burns


